I have never written a letter to a magazine letters page
in my life. I’ve written to the
Methodist Recorder a couple of times, but never to a magazine, until last week.
It was the November issue of Christianity Magazine that
prompted me to write; specifically a letter that they published complaining
about the magazine publishing a news item about New Wine’s support for Women
Bishops in the Church of England. The
correspondent repeated the trite and ill-informed position that the Bible
forbids a woman to have authority over a man and suggests that it is the place
of women to be meek and submissive.
Reading this letter made my blood boil and after several days of
reflection I decided that such sexist and misogynistic attitudes cannot be left
unchallenged.
This is actually just the latest instance of encountering
sexist attitudes in the church. I was
recently speaking to a woman minister who told me about a man who had left her
church when she became minister.
Apparently he’d said that he had nothing against her personally; he just
didn’t agree with woman ministers (and this in the Methodist Church which has
had woman ministers since the early seventies).
He thought, I’m sure, that he was being kind with his words, but you can’t
really say you have nothing against somebody personally when you are rejecting
them because of their sex.
I suppose that it is still possible, if you ignore
Biblical scholarship, reason and experience to hold a position that the Bible
forbids women in leadership, but it is a tenuous position. The same Paul who supposedly forbade a woman
to have authority over a man also wrote, “there are neither male nor female,
Jew or Gentile, Slave or free but all are one in Christ Jesus.” It is also clear from Paul’s letters that
women had positions of authority in the early church and Paul calls some women “co-workers.” Even
if you believe that all scripture is basically the result of Divine dictation
with the author merely acting as a scribe for God, you cannot ignore the
passages that treat women as equals with authority as leaders, both in the New
Testament and, yes, even in the Old Testament.
Very, very few Christians, if any, today would accept
discrimination in the church on grounds of race. A letter written to a Christian magazine
promoting a racist point of view simply wouldn’t be published, even if the
write tried misquoting scripture to back up their argument. To my mind sexism is just as unacceptable and
evil as racism and should be treated by the church in just the same way. Both denigrate human beings because of who
they physically are, both fail to recognise that the image of God is in every
human being and both fail to love our neighbour as we love ourselves.
It really is time that sexism in the church became a
thing of the past!
Rick, I wholeheartedly agree - just as those who are evangelicals misquote or misunderstand Scripture to take such a position, so those in my catholic part of the Church misquote and misunderstand Tradition when they attempt to argue the same thing (at least, as far as I see it). Just one thing - I believe the term "woman/en bishop" and "woman/en minister" (or Deacon or Presbyter or Priest) plays into the hands of those who are against. Why? Because woman/en is a noun. This therefore makes the term "woman [whatever]" a compound noun, as distinct from the [whatever] itself. And the point is that there is no distinction - an ordained minister of any description is simply that - an ordained minister. (Ok, not just simply, but you know what I mean!) If we wish to have an adjective that denotes that currently half the population is denied particular roles in particular denominations then that word is female, not woman. So, in the C of E there are no female bishops (currently). There never will be (hopefully) "women bishops", there will simply be "bishops", some of whom can be described by the adjective "male" and some by the adjective "female".
ReplyDeleteGood point Mendipnomad. I used the terms 'woman bishop' and 'women bishops' because that is the phrase the letter in Christianity magazine used, and also the terms used in recent news reports. I quite agree that 'female bishops' would be better and will hopefully just be called bishops with no need for noun or adjective.
ReplyDelete